The rubric
Total weight 100 points. A final score out of 5.0 is the weighted sum divided by 20, rounded to one decimal. Category weights reflect how much each block moves the needle for a real adult viewer.
Content and offer
20 / 100
| Catalogue depth | 6 | Scene or offer count, release pacing, niche breadth |
| Quality of what we saw | 8 | Resolution, production, performer range, writing |
| Freshness | 3 | Update frequency during our 14+ day observation window |
| Exclusivity | 3 | Content genuinely unique to the platform |
Pricing and billing
15 / 100
| Transparent pricing | 5 | What you pay vs what the landing page promised |
| Honest renewal | 4 | No surprise upsells, trial traps, or hidden cross-sites |
| Cancellation flow | 3 | We cancelled mid-test and timed it |
| Chargeback reputation | 3 | Processor coding, card statement wording, refund history |
Experience and UX
15 / 100
| Desktop UX | 5 | Navigation, search, player quality, ad density if any |
| Mobile UX | 6 | Touch-friendly, fast video, readable, no modal spam |
| Accessibility | 4 | Contrast, captions on cam shows, keyboard navigation |
Privacy and safety
15 / 100
| Data handling | 5 | What the privacy policy actually permits them to do |
| Payment processing | 4 | Which merchant, which bank, is the charge discreet |
| No dark patterns | 3 | Opt-out friction, fake badges, countdown manipulation |
| Malware, ads, redirects | 3 | Running uBlock tests, checking third-party requests |
Performer ethics
15 / 100
| Performer vetting | 5 | 2257 compliance, identity verification documented |
| Non-consent signals | 5 | Evidence of or absence of ethical production practices |
| Fair payout to models | 5 | For cam sites - percentage split and withdrawal terms |
Support and trust
10 / 100
| Customer service | 4 | We email a real question and time the response |
| Refund policy | 3 | Written, not implied. Tested once per year |
| Years in operation | 3 | Historical record - track record matters |
Editor conviction
10 / 100
| Would recommend to a friend | 5 | The blunt personal verdict |
| Would pay from our own money | 5 | Because we already did |
How we actually test
- We pick a target. Either reader-requested, a new launch worth stress-testing, or an incumbent due for re-review.
- We pay in with a real card. Same billing flow you would hit. No press accounts, no freebies, no affiliate manager hand-holding.
- We use it properly. Minimum eight hours of active usage for small sites. Fourteen days minimum for anything with a monthly billing cycle or ongoing catalogue.
- We trigger the rough edges. We cancel once, we email support with a real issue, we check mobile on 4G. We capture screenshots during the session.
- One editor drafts, one editor counters. A second editor runs a devil's-advocate pass before anything publishes.
- We re-test every 90 days. Rankings move when the site moves.
What we refuse to do
- Accept payment for a ranking position. Affiliate commission covers the bills, not the ranks. Rankings have never changed because of a commission change.
- Copy another publication's ranking. If you see our order match another site word for word, it is coincidence, and we will review it publicly.
- Publish a review without a named editor byline. Every piece has one editor who owns it and gets corrections at their email.
- Use generative AI as an author. We use it as a drafting tool - structure, research summaries, first passes. The published voice is human, always named.
- Hide updates. If a ranking shifts, the old version gets a changelog entry at the bottom of the page.
How to hold us accountable
Email editors@freepornfull.com with a concrete correction. We respond within three business days. Meaningful corrections get a visible correction notice on the affected piece.